Policy

Open Access Policy

Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation follows an open access model, making all published articles freely available to the public. Readers can access, read, and download content without any subscription or payment, ensuring broad and unrestricted dissemination of research findings.

The journal typically publishes articles under a Creative Commons license, which permits sharing and reuse with proper attribution. This approach supports transparency, academic collaboration, and the ethical use of published content.

Open access publishing in the journal allows authors to reach a global audience, increasing the visibility and impact of their work. It also ensures that scientific knowledge in the field of filtration and separation is accessible to researchers, professionals, and institutions worldwide.

plagiarism policy

Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation maintains a strict stance against plagiarism to uphold the integrity of scholarly publishing. All submitted manuscripts are expected to be original and must not contain any form of copied or uncredited content from previously published work.

To ensure originality, the journal uses plagiarism detection software during the review process. Manuscripts found to contain significant similarity with existing literature without proper citation will be rejected or returned to the authors for revision, depending on the severity of the case.

Authors are responsible for ensuring the authenticity of their work and for appropriately citing all sources and references. Any attempt to present someone else’s work as one’s own, including self-plagiarism, will be considered a serious ethical violation and may result in the rejection of the manuscript and possible blacklisting of the authors.

Review policy

Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation follows a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, validity, and originality of all submitted manuscripts. Each submission is initially assessed by the editorial team to determine its suitability for the journal’s scope and standards.

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to independent reviewers with relevant expertise for a double-blind review. This means that both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities are kept confidential throughout the process, promoting objective and unbiased evaluations.

Reviewers assess the manuscript’s scientific merit, clarity, methodology, and contribution to the field. Based on their feedback, the editorial team makes a decision to accept, reject, or request revisions. Authors are expected to respond to reviewer comments constructively and promptly to support the integrity of the publication process.